Email a link to this page to a friend
How to edit this page
Read the latest posts by date
Art
Book Reviews
Entrepreneurship
Español
Life
Public Service
Proposals for Government
Science
Search Engine Marketing
Sports
Technology
Travel
World Affairs
In the second part, the one that caught my attention, Vivek described experiments with Bede Broome in which they presented pairs of odorants that were overlapping or in close temporal succession. He showed examples of masking (where the presence of the first odor prevents the formation of the representation of the second) and examples where the representation in locust antennal lobe projection neurons (PNs) shifted mid-stream from the representation of the first odor to the late part of the representation of the second.
In this context, Vivek described what he called 'phantom odors': neurons which respond during the transition between presentation of one odorant and another. Furthermore, at least some Kenyon cell responses in the locust appeared to depend on the order in which the two successive odorants were presented. The word 'phantom' has been used in neuroscience before to describe the sensation or percept of a limb that no longer exists. It seems to me that what Vivek described is not (the neural basis of) a percept of an odor that's not there, but rather a representation of a sequence of odors (or of a transition between odors, which may well be an odor in its own right). Might a more fitting name for these Kenyon cells be olfactory dynamics neurons, or olfactory movie neurons?
The study of olfaction has long concentrated on static odor pulses, but the olfactory world is much richer than that. Might this signal the beginning of the mainstream study of olfactory kinematics at last?
Up to Science.
Page Information
|
Wiki Information |
![]() Update to PBwiki 2.0 An entirely new PBwiki experience, including folders and easier editing. |